Draft Review

Review AI-generated broker drafts with policy comparisons, risk checks, and citation-backed confidence.

Wave 01

117 requests reviewed across 4 workflows

Overall draft confidence

82%

Top-performing workflow

COI requests

Primary risk

Policy mismatch

Evidence coverage

96 citations

Workflow Quality Mix

Weighted quality contribution and confidence split.

Coverage fit

Score 8.4/10

Positive 64%Neutral 24%Negative 12%

Renewal readiness

Score 7.9/10

Positive 57%Neutral 28%Negative 15%

Carrier appetite

Score 7.2/10

Positive 49%Neutral 32%Negative 19%

Documentation quality

Score 6.9/10

Positive 46%Neutral 34%Negative 20%

Review Queue

Validation checkpoints and required broker actions.

Coverage validation

Pending broker check

AMS cross-check

Approved

Citation quality

3 records need verification

Segment Comparison

Lift in draft quality versus baseline process.

Commercial Auto61% vs 52%

General Liability74% vs 64%

Workers Comp58% vs 56%

Property41% vs 47%

Confidence and Evidence

Confidence metrics with policy-linked evidence.

Draft accuracy68% ±3.1

Policy match confidence54% ±2.7

Client-ready language63% ±2.2

Carrier response readiness48% ±3.8

Top signal: AI-generated COI drafts reduced turnaround by 31% while maintaining policy-limit accuracy (citations 12, 27, 42).